<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>portable learner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shantarohse.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shantarohse.com</link>
	<description>stories, patterns, community, complexities and, oh, the possibilites of learning in the net age</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Never Say Die: Why We Can&#8217;t Imagine Death</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/588/never-say-die-why-we-cant-imagine-death/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/588/never-say-die-why-we-cant-imagine-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reconceptualizing understandings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/588/never-say-die-why-we-cant-imagine-death/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=never-say-die" title="Never Say Die: Why We Can't Imagine Death">Jesse Bering on why so many of us think our minds continue on after we die</a>; rather than being a by-product of religion or an emotional security blanket, such beliefs stem from the very nature of our consciousness. <blockquote cite="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=never-say-die" title="Jesse Bering">And so person permanence may be the final cognitive hurdle that gets in the way of our effectively realizing the dead as they truly are—infinitely in situ, inanimate carbon residue. Instead it's much more "natural" to imagine them as existing in some vague, unobservable locale, very much living their dead lives.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zY2lhbS5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS5jZm0/aWQ9bmV2ZXItc2F5LWRpZQ==" title=\"Never Say Die: Why We Can't Imagine Death\">Jesse Bering on why so many of us think our minds continue on after we die</a>; rather than being a by-product of religion or an emotional security blanket, such beliefs stem from the very nature of our consciousness.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=never-say-die" title="Jesse Bering"><p>And so person permanence may be the final cognitive hurdle that gets in the way of our effectively realizing the dead as they truly are—infinitely in situ, inanimate carbon residue. Instead it&#8217;s much more &#8220;natural&#8221; to imagine them as existing in some vague, unobservable locale, very much living their dead lives.</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=588" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/588/never-say-die-why-we-cant-imagine-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re Sick. Now What? Knowledge is Power.</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/587/youre-sick-now-what-knowledge-is-power/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/587/youre-sick-now-what-knowledge-is-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[evaluating the quality of digital resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/587/youre-sick-now-what-knowledge-is-power/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/health/30pati.html?ref=health" title="You're Sick. Now What? Knowledge is Power.">Oncologist Marisa Weiss's advice to those inclined to research their own medical care</a>: it's mandatory. "The time you have with your doctor is getting progressively shorter, yet there's so much more to talk about. You have to prepare for this important meeting." This New York Times special section, Decoding Your Health, offers useful advice on evaluating what you might find: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/health/30stud.html?pagewanted=1&#038;_r=1" title="Medical studies vary in validity of findings">a primer on interpreting medical studies</a> shows that "no matter how compelling and exciting a hypothesis is, we don't know whether it works without clinical trials"; and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/health/30seco.html" title="Pain, a Limp and Winkle Picker's Disease">self-diagnosis via the internet may well prove you have a fool for a doctor</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDA4LzA5LzMwL2hlYWx0aC8zMHBhdGkuaHRtbD9yZWY9aGVhbHRo" title=\"You're Sick. Now What? Knowledge is Power.\">Oncologist Marisa Weiss&#8217;s advice to those inclined to research their own medical care</a>: it&#8217;s mandatory. &#8220;The time you have with your doctor is getting progressively shorter, yet there&#8217;s so much more to talk about. You have to prepare for this important meeting.&#8221; This New York Times special section, Decoding Your Health, offers useful advice on evaluating what you might find: <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDA4LzA5LzMwL2hlYWx0aC8zMHN0dWQuaHRtbD9wYWdld2FudGVkPTEmIzAzODtfcj0x" title=\"Medical studies vary in validity of findings\">a primer on interpreting medical studies</a> shows that &#8220;no matter how compelling and exciting a hypothesis is, we don&#8217;t know whether it works without clinical trials&#8221;; and <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDA4LzA5LzMwL2hlYWx0aC8zMHNlY28uaHRtbA==" title=\"Pain, a Limp and Winkle Picker's Disease\">self-diagnosis via the internet may well prove you have a fool for a doctor</a>.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=587" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/587/youre-sick-now-what-knowledge-is-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean View</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/586/ocean-view/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/586/ocean-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locating information and resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/586/ocean-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thesmartset.com/article/article09260801.aspx" title="Ocean View">Jesse Smith's review of the recently renovated US National Museum of Natural History</a> points out the metamorphosis from stuffy science institution to modern entity that must "educate without boring, elucidate without offending, and advocate without annoying." For example, the museum offers no linear progression through the exhibit, but rather any number of natural courses that reflect the chaos of the ocean itself: <blockquote title="Jesse Smith" cite="http://thesmartset.com/article/article09260801.aspx">Earth's oceans, we are reminded, form a single interconnected body of water. Its species and currents are not constrained by labels such as Atlantic and Pacific, so why should their interpretation? Sections meld seamlessly into one another, but information in each is presented in a constrained manner so that if you do, say, jump from a stuffed penguin in Poles to a preserved Coelacanth (the giant fish considered extinct until a fisherman found one off the coast of South African in 1938), a visitor can still learn or experience at each. With the exception of the Journey Through Time exhibit — which explores the slow march of evolution that began underwater — there is never a progression to follow, no order by which a visitor must read or look. In this way, touring the hall feels a lot like surfing the Web.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3RoZXNtYXJ0c2V0LmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL2FydGljbGUwOTI2MDgwMS5hc3B4" title=\"Ocean View\">Jesse Smith&#8217;s review of the recently renovated US National Museum of Natural History</a> points out the metamorphosis from stuffy science institution to modern entity that must &#8220;educate without boring, elucidate without offending, and advocate without annoying.&#8221; For example, the museum offers no linear progression through the exhibit, but rather any number of natural courses that reflect the chaos of the ocean itself:</p>
<blockquote title="Jesse Smith" cite="http://thesmartset.com/article/article09260801.aspx"><p>
Earth&#8217;s oceans, we are reminded, form a single interconnected body of water. Its species and currents are not constrained by labels such as Atlantic and Pacific, so why should their interpretation? Sections meld seamlessly into one another, but information in each is presented in a constrained manner so that if you do, say, jump from a stuffed penguin in Poles to a preserved Coelacanth (the giant fish considered extinct until a fisherman found one off the coast of South African in 1938), a visitor can still learn or experience at each. With the exception of the Journey Through Time exhibit — which explores the slow march of evolution that began underwater — there is never a progression to follow, no order by which a visitor must read or look. In this way, touring the hall feels a lot like surfing the Web.
</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=586" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/586/ocean-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is laughter almost non-existent in ancient Greek sculpture?</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/583/why-is-laughter-almost-non-existent-in-ancient-greek-sculpture/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/583/why-is-laughter-almost-non-existent-in-ancient-greek-sculpture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/583/why-is-laughter-almost-non-existent-in-ancient-greek-sculpture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-09-18-kindi-en.html" title="Why is laughter almost non-existent in ancient Greek sculpture" class="external">Electrical Engineering professor Yannis Tsividis innocently asks, why is it that we very rarely see laughter depicted in ancient Greek sculpture?</a> From the range of scholarly answers, you get the peculiar sense that we "moderns" are not in a position to give an answer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ldXJvemluZS5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZXMvMjAwOC0wOS0xOC1raW5kaS1lbi5odG1s" title=\"Why is laughter almost non-existent in ancient Greek sculpture\" class=\"external\">Electrical Engineering professor Yannis Tsividis innocently asks, why is it that we very rarely see laughter depicted in ancient Greek sculpture?</a> From the range of scholarly answers, you get the peculiar sense that we &#8220;moderns&#8221; are not in a position to give an answer.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=583" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/583/why-is-laughter-almost-non-existent-in-ancient-greek-sculpture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Heaven on Earth</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/584/no-heaven-on-earth/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/584/no-heaven-on-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engaging with online learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/584/no-heaven-on-earth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are so many of us so skeptical when confronted with the overwhelming evidence for environmental consequences of destroying everything we come in contact with? <a href="http://bookforum.com/inprint/015_03/2721" title="No Heaven On Earth" class="external">In her review of <cite>American Earth,</cite> an anthology of American environmentalist views, Verlyn Klinkenborg</cite> has this reaction to the barrage of evidence and entreaties to reconnect with nature:</a> <blockquote cite="http://bookforum.com/inprint/015_03/2721" title="Verlyn Klinkenborg">After a day or two, I found myself reading this anthology as if it were a series of reports from a distant planet in a distant time—as an appendix, perhaps, to Doris Lessing's Canopus in Argos novels. Reading American Earth in that light helped make several things clear. First, each document in the volume is a minority report—sometimes a minority of one. The assumptions, the hopes, the arguments in nearly every one of these pieces, no matter when they were written, are contradicted by the way the vast majority of Americans live and by the political and economic structures that determine that lifestyle. Second, the fundamental environmentalist arguments—the fundamental perceptions—are unchanging over time; only the details vary. We are still catching up to Thoreau, still coming to terms with the outrage George Perkins Marsh expressed in 1864, his worries about "climatic excess" and our "restless love of change." Third, writers in every generation take a crack at finding the crystalline argument that will induce an epiphany in skeptical readers—for nothing less than an epiphany will do to persuade them to change the way they go about living. Yet every generation fails, in part because skeptical readers so seldom pick up this kind of writing or submit to its evidence.</blockquote> Her conclusion is also worth noting. She reaches for Kafka (<q>There is infinite hope, but not for us.</q>) and writes regretfully: <q>I would say something different if I could. I have every faith in nature's recuperative powers....What I doubt is our ability, as a species, to see and, having seen, to continue to pay attention.</q>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are so many of us so skeptical when confronted with the overwhelming evidence for environmental consequences of destroying everything we come in contact with? <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Jvb2tmb3J1bS5jb20vaW5wcmludC8wMTVfMDMvMjcyMQ==" title=\"No Heaven On Earth\" class=\"external\">In her review of <cite>American Earth,</cite> an anthology of American environmentalist views, Verlyn Klinkenborg</cite> has this reaction to the barrage of evidence and entreaties to reconnect with nature:</a></p>
<blockquote cite="http://bookforum.com/inprint/015_03/2721" title="Verlyn Klinkenborg"><p>
After a day or two, I found myself reading this anthology as if it were a series of reports from a distant planet in a distant time—as an appendix, perhaps, to Doris Lessing&#8217;s Canopus in Argos novels. Reading American Earth in that light helped make several things clear. First, each document in the volume is a minority report—sometimes a minority of one. The assumptions, the hopes, the arguments in nearly every one of these pieces, no matter when they were written, are contradicted by the way the vast majority of Americans live and by the political and economic structures that determine that lifestyle. Second, the fundamental environmentalist arguments—the fundamental perceptions—are unchanging over time; only the details vary. We are still catching up to Thoreau, still coming to terms with the outrage George Perkins Marsh expressed in 1864, his worries about &#8220;climatic excess&#8221; and our &#8220;restless love of change.&#8221; Third, writers in every generation take a crack at finding the crystalline argument that will induce an epiphany in skeptical readers—for nothing less than an epiphany will do to persuade them to change the way they go about living. Yet every generation fails, in part because skeptical readers so seldom pick up this kind of writing or submit to its evidence.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Her conclusion is also worth noting. She reaches for Kafka (<q>There is infinite hope, but not for us.</q>) and writes regretfully: <q>I would say something different if I could. I have every faith in nature&#8217;s recuperative powers&#8230;.What I doubt is our ability, as a species, to see and, having seen, to continue to pay attention.</q></p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=584" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/584/no-heaven-on-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transfusion Reading List</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/359/transfusion-reading-list/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/359/transfusion-reading-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Project Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feeds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PubMed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transfusion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TRIP database]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/2007/09/transfusion-reading-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Combine PubMed searches with RSS utility to create a personal reading list for the discerning transfusion information maven.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ubG0ubmloLmdvdi8=" title=\"U.S National Library of Medicine\" class=\"external\">U.S. National Library of Medicine&#8217;s</a> invaluable service, <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uY2JpLm5sbS5uaWguZ292L3NpdGVzL2VudHJlei8=" title=\"PubMed\" class=\"external\">PubMed</a>, lets you search some 18 million biomedical citations dating back to the 1950&#8217;s. What&#8217;s more, you can save your searches as an <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3NoYW50YXJvaHNlLmNvbS84NC9yZWFsbHktc2ltcGxlLXN5bmRpY2F0aW9uLw==" class=\"kblinker\" title=\"More about RSS &raquo;\">RSS</a> feed. This means you can create your own transfusion medicine reading list, something like what I&#8217;ve done below. Click the folders and links below to browse recently published article by topic, author or journal. </p>
<p>If are not familiar with RSS and feeds, try the <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL25ld3MuYmJjLmNvLnVrLzEvaGkvaGVscC8zMjIzNDg0LnN0bQ==" title=\"News Feed from the BBC\" class=\"external\">News Feeds from the BBC</a> for a gentle introduction. Be sure to explore <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uY2JpLm5sbS5uaWguZ292L2Jvb2tzL2J2LmZjZ2k/cmlkPWhlbHBwdWJtZWQuc2VjdGlvbi5wdWJtZWRoZWxwLlB1Yk1lZF9RdWlja19TdGFydA==" title=\"PubMed Quick Start\" class=\"external\">PubMed&#8217;s search help</a> (in particular, <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uY2JpLm5sbS5uaWguZ292L2Jvb2tzL2J2LmZjZ2k/cmlkPWhlbHBwdWJtZWQuc2VjdGlvbi5wdWJtZWRoZWxwLlNhdmluZ19hbmRfRW1haWxpbmdf" title=\"PubMed Help: Saving and Emailing Results and Searches\" class=\"external\">Saving and Emailing Results and Searches</a>) to hone your search query skills. Then create your own reading list. Or just copy any of the feeds below into your own reader.</p>
<p><ins datetime="2008-09-29T14:18:2804:00">Added a feed from a search query for transfusion medicine guidelines available at the <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50cmlwZGF0YWJhc2UuY29tLw==" title=\"TRIP database\" class=\"external\">Tripdatabase</a>.</ins></p>
<p>[sniplet tmreadinglistgrazr]</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=359" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/359/transfusion-reading-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking the Earth&#8217;s Temperature</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/585/taking-the-earths-temperature/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/585/taking-the-earths-temperature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[evaluating the quality of digital resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/585/taking-the-earths-temperature/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do we measure our planet's global mean temperature, and compare it to a record dating back hundreds of thousands of years, a comparison central to discussions about climate change? <a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/taking-the-earths-temperature" title="Taking the Earths Temperature" class="external">Jordan R. Raney's description of the ingenious but impaired proxy measures</a> from tree rings to coral reefs are meant to encourage skepticism for some of the more extreme claims that have been made. Unfortunately, we still need to make decisions about climate change, however incomplete, uncertain the data we have is. In fact, that is the challenge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we measure our planet&#8217;s global mean temperature, and compare it to a record dating back hundreds of thousands of years, a comparison central to discussions about climate change? <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50aGVuZXdhdGxhbnRpcy5jb20vcHVibGljYXRpb25zL3Rha2luZy10aGUtZWFydGhzLXRlbXBlcmF0dXJl" title=\"Taking the Earths Temperature\" class=\"external\">Jordan R. Raney&#8217;s description of the ingenious but impaired proxy measures</a> from tree rings to coral reefs are meant to encourage skepticism for some of the more extreme claims that have been made. Unfortunately, we still need to make decisions about climate change, however incomplete, uncertain the data we have is. In fact, that is the challenge.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=585" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/585/taking-the-earths-temperature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Interpretive Walk Through Mer Bleu</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/86/interpretive-walk-mer-bleu/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/86/interpretive-walk-mer-bleu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Field Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[informal learning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Fletcher]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[learning design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mer Bleue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/hypothetical-journal/an-intrepretive-walk-through-the-mer-bleu-conservation-area</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interpretive walk at the Mer Bleue Boardwalk Trail is about more than being entertained or gathering random facts about ecologically sensitive bogs. It's also about conveying the meaning and value of a place through informal learning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mere 15 minutes from our front porch, in Ottawa&#39;s greenbelt parklands, is this treasure: Mer Bleue, a spaghnum bog and wildlife sanctuary named for a blue mist that rises mysteriously under just the right weather conditions. This morning we decided to walk the Mer Bleue Boardwalk Trail. The crunch of spring snow under our feet surely scared whatever wildlife we may have otherwise seen this frosty morning, and we were left to read, uninterrupted, the numerous interpretation signs that mark the 1.2 km path. This is how I came to know not only about the blue mist for which the bog is named, but that bogs are common features uch further north in the Boreal forests of northern Canada, and that Mer Bleue&#39;s current topography was created some 9,500 years ago thanks to the retreating Laurentide Ice Sheet and Champlain Sea. Deposits of sphagnum peat moss form a dense mat up to 6 m deep in some areas, which keeps the water uniquely oxygen-poor, excessively cold, and highly acidic. According to one sign, the water here is 1000 times more acidic than milk.</p>
<p>Now, why am I going to remember that for a long time to come?</p>
<p>Interpretation is an informal educational method used widely in museums, parks and zoos to convey the meaning and value of a place. <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2l0ZWNoMS5jb2UudWdhLmVkdS9pdGZvcnVtL3BhcGVyODAvcGFwZXI4MC5odG0=" title=\"Ellen Dornan: Road Map for Educational Multimedia Design\" class=\"external\">It is very effective in a short period of time</a>. Why? Because <span class="pullquote">interpretation offers high-quality communication at the precise moment when a visitor to the museum or park is awed by their surroundings</span>, the very definition of a teachable moment.</p>
<p>Mer Bleue is part of <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYW5hZGFzY2FwaXRhbC5nYy5jYS9iaW5zL25jY193ZWJfY29udGVudF9wYWdlLmFzcD9jaWQ9MTYyOTctMTYyOTktOTczNSZhbXA7bGFuZz0x" title=\"The National Capital Greenbelt\" class=\"external\">Ottawa&#39;s greenbelt system of parklands</a> managed by the National Capital Commission (NCC), a Crown Agency of the Canadian government. It has also been designated as a <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy53ZXRsYW5kcy5vcmcvcmVwb3J0cy9yaXMvNENBMDMzZW4ucGRm" title=\"Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands: Mer Beue Conservation Area\" class=\"external\">Wetland of International Significance under the Ramsar Convention</a> since October 1995. Yet, it wasn&#39;t always an internationally significant conservation area. During World War II, the Royal Canadian Air Force used this area for bombing practice. Today it is threatened by urban sprawl, the unchecked activities of beavers and those of us who don&#39;t recognizeits significance.  The NCC&#39;s challenge is to deliver fascinating accounts of the ecology and the geology of the bog, and compelling stories of the French settlers that described the blue mist, and to reveal to those of us perhaps more interested in a Sunday morning walk than ecological advocacy why Mer Bleue should be interpreted at all. Why does it matter? In her book, <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY2EvZXhlYy9vYmlkb3MvcmVkaXJlY3Q/dGFnPXNoYW50YXJvaHNlLTIwJTI2bGlua19jb2RlPXhtMiUyNmNhbXA9MjAyNSUyNmNyZWF0aXZlPTE2NTk1MyUyNnBhdGg9aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY2EvZ3AvcmVkaXJlY3QuaHRtbCUyNTNmQVNJTj0xNTUwNDE3NzAzJTI1MjZ0YWc9c2hhbnRhcm9oc2UtMjAlMjUyNmxjb2RlPXhtMiUyNTI2Y0lEPTIwMjUlMjUyNmNjbUlEPTE2NTk1MyUyNTI2bG9jYXRpb249L28vQVNJTi8xNTUwNDE3NzAzJTI1MjUzRlN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbklkPTBFTVY0NEE5QTVZVDFSVkRHWjgy" title=\"View product details at Amazon\" class=\"external\">Capital Rambles: Exploring National Capital Region</a>, Katherine Fletcher answers that the moss mats fullfill a significant ecological niche:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=shantarohse-20%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.ca/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=1550417703%2526tag=shantarohse-20%2526lcode=xm2%2526cID=2025%2526ccmID=165953%2526location=/o/ASIN/1550417703%25253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82" title="Katherine Fletcher, 2003"><p>&#8230;the wetland serve as &quot;lungs&quot; of the earth, much in the same way as mangrove trees do in the tropics. Mer Bleue bog is critical to the health of its surrounding landscape because it filters contaminants from the watershed region. It also services as natural reservoir by replenishing the water table. More than 75 percent of Ontario&#39;s wetlands have been drained, so it is particularly important that the NCC remains committed to maintaining Mer Bleue as an internationally significant conservation area (p. 75).</p></blockquote>
<p>NCC&#39;s interpretive walk is not meant merely to entertain or disseminate facts about bogs, although it does do that. It is meant to create empathy and meaning for this special place. <em>Remnants of the last ice age</em>. <em>More acidic than milk</em>. <em>Unique flora and fauna</em>. On this very spot a mere 15 minutes from our front porch. Meaningful places matter to us; we are far more likely to serve as environmental stewards. The real success of the interpretive walk is that it creates the kind of empathy that ensures Mer Bleue may will survive many more thousands of years.</p>
<h3>More</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2RlbC5pY2lvLnVzL1NoYW50YS9pbnRlcnByZXRhdGlvbg==" title=\"del.icio.us/Shanta/interpretation\" class=\"external\">My del.icio.us interpretation links</a></li>
<li><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYXJsc2JhZHNwcmluZ3MuY2EvZW4vYXR0cmFjdGlvbnMvbWVyYmxldWUucGhw" title=\"La Mer Bleue Carlsbad Springs Community Association\" class=\"external\">La Mer Bleue</a>: Neighbouring Carlsbad Springs offers this informative, slightly academic description of Mer Bleue bog, quite unlike the typical tourist brochures.</li>
<li><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zYXRlbGxpdGVpbXByZXNzaW9ucy5jb20vbmNybWVyYmxldWUuaHRtbA==" title=\"A Virtual Tour of the National Capital Region\" class=\"external\">A Virtual Tour of the National Capital Region</a>: Interesting satellite imagery of the Mer Bleue bog from Satellite Impressions, which shows the different vegetation communities quite clearly.</li>
<li><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY2EvZXhlYy9vYmlkb3MvcmVkaXJlY3Q/dGFnPXNoYW50YXJvaHNlLTIwJTI2bGlua19jb2RlPXhtMiUyNmNhbXA9MjAyNSUyNmNyZWF0aXZlPTE2NTk1MyUyNnBhdGg9aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY2EvZ3AvcmVkaXJlY3QuaHRtbCUyNTNmQVNJTj0xNTUwNDE3NzAzJTI1MjZ0YWc9c2hhbnRhcm9oc2UtMjAlMjUyNmxjb2RlPXhtMiUyNTI2Y0lEPTIwMjUlMjUyNmNjbUlEPTE2NTk1MyUyNTI2bG9jYXRpb249L28vQVNJTi8xNTUwNDE3NzAzJTI1MjUzRlN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbklkPTBFTVY0NEE5QTVZVDFSVkRHWjgy" title=\"View product details at Amazon\"><img class="alignright" src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/capital-rambles.jpg" border="0" alt="Capital Rambles" title="Capital Rambles:Exploring the National Capital" width="101" height="149" />Capital Rambles: Exploring National Capital Region</a>: Katherine Fletcher&#39;s insider&#39;s guide to Canada&#39;s national capital region - West Quebec (the Outaouais) and Eastern Ontario region that surround Ottawa. If you are visiting us, this book will guide you along 12 &quot;rambles&quot; through hills, lakes, watersheds and heritage villages, including, of course, Mer Bleu.</li>
</ul>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=86" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/86/interpretive-walk-mer-bleu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memories, Emotion and the Nose</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/577/memories-emotion-and-the-nose/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/577/memories-emotion-and-the-nose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/science/05angier.html?_r=1&#038;ref=science&#038;oref=login" title="The Nose, an Emotional Time Machine" class="external">Natalie Angier reports from the International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste</a> held in San Francisco, including this insight into how smells, feelings and memories become so easily and intimately entangled: “With a phone number, if you get a new one, a week later you may have forgotten the old one,” Dr. Herz said. “With smells, it’s the other way around. The first association is better than the second.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDA4LzA4LzA1L3NjaWVuY2UvMDVhbmdpZXIuaHRtbD9fcj0xJiMwMzg7cmVmPXNjaWVuY2UmIzAzODtvcmVmPWxvZ2lu" title=\"The Nose, an Emotional Time Machine\" class=\"external\">Natalie Angier reports from the International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste</a> held in San Francisco, including this insight into how smells, feelings and memories become so easily and intimately entangled: “With a phone number, if you get a new one, a week later you may have forgotten the old one,” Dr. Herz said. “With smells, it’s the other way around. The first association is better than the second.”</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=577" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/577/memories-emotion-and-the-nose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Succeed In Business Without Putting People Last</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/575/succeed-in-business-without-people-last/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/575/succeed-in-business-without-people-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At some point in your surfing escapades you begin to grasp that the profound impact of the internet on learning is not its vast stores of content, but its ability to support the various facets of social learning. You begin to appreciate that knowledge is not just a lump of something that is passed on via various pedagogical tactics, and your attention begins to shift from the content of a subject to the learning activities and human interventions around which that content is situated. <a href="http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/MindsonFireOpenEducationt/45823?time=1218064615" title="Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0" class="external">John Seely Brown</a> identifies this as a shift from "learning about" to "learning to be." And "learning to be" calls for interpersonal skills not easily acquired by textbook learning. It's in this context I found myself reading back issues of <a href="http://www.incharacter.org/index.php" title="In Character" class="external">In Character</a>, which examines virtues within our communities our families and ourselves. The current issue delves into compassion; this observation from <a href="http://www.incharacter.org/article.php?article=109" title="Java and Sympathy –
a former Starbucks president tells how to succeed in business without putting people last" class="external">Howard Behar who emphasizes compassion as a vital component of acquiring personal leadership skills caught my attention:</a> <blockquote cite="http://www.incharacter.org/article.php?article=109" title="Howard Behar">People are not assets. Caring isn’t just about admiring the charismatic leaders, the people that everybody likes, or the in crowd. This is the big caring we do that shows we “care, like we really mean it.” It’s about words and actions that everybody sees and recognizes. There’s an old adage that says, “People don’t care how much you know, they want to know how much you care.”</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point in your surfing escapades you begin to grasp that the profound impact of the internet on learning is not its vast stores of content, but its ability to support the various facets of social learning. You begin to appreciate that knowledge is not just a lump of something that is passed on via various pedagogical tactics, and your attention begins to shift from the content of a subject to the learning activities and human interventions around which that content is situated. <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Nvbm5lY3QuZWR1Y2F1c2UuZWR1L0xpYnJhcnkvRURVQ0FVU0UrUmV2aWV3L01pbmRzb25GaXJlT3BlbkVkdWNhdGlvbnQvNDU4MjM/dGltZT0xMjE4MDY0NjE1" title=\"Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0\" class=\"external\">John Seely Brown</a> identifies this as a shift from &#8220;learning about&#8221; to &#8220;learning to be.&#8221; And &#8220;learning to be&#8221; calls for interpersonal skills not easily acquired by textbook learning. It&#8217;s in this context I found myself reading back issues of <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pbmNoYXJhY3Rlci5vcmcvaW5kZXgucGhw" title=\"In Character\" class=\"external\">In Character</a>, which examines virtues within our communities our families and ourselves. The current issue delves into compassion; this observation from <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pbmNoYXJhY3Rlci5vcmcvYXJ0aWNsZS5waHA/YXJ0aWNsZT0xMDk=" title=\"Java and Sympathy –<br />
a former Starbucks president tells how to succeed in business without putting people last" class="external">Howard Behar who emphasizes compassion as a vital component of acquiring personal leadership skills caught my attention:</a></p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.incharacter.org/article.php?article=109" title="Howard Behar"><p>
People are not assets. Caring isn’t just about admiring the charismatic leaders, the people that everybody likes, or the in crowd. This is the big caring we do that shows we “care, like we really mean it.” It’s about words and actions that everybody sees and recognizes. There’s an old adage that says, “People don’t care how much you know, they want to know how much you care.”
</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=575" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/575/succeed-in-business-without-people-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Share&#8212;Build</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/573/dont-share-build/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/573/dont-share-build/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://the-knowledgeworks.blogspot.com/2008/07/dont-share-build.html" title="Dont Share--Build" class="external">Victor Newman on the futility of everyone sharing everything in an organization:</a> The first problem is the implicit economic paradigm people apply to ideas and knowledge: if everything is shared, it will be perceived to have little or no value. Second, you can spend as much time interpreting shared things of low value as high. Third, people will only share with those whom they respect and from whom they can expect a return or who share the same problem of preserving or reinventing identity. These people don't always work in the same organization. And fourth, not everyone is either pre-disposed or equipped to create (leave alone share) knowledge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3RoZS1rbm93bGVkZ2V3b3Jrcy5ibG9nc3BvdC5jb20vMjAwOC8wNy9kb250LXNoYXJlLWJ1aWxkLmh0bWw=" title=\"Dont Share--Build\" class=\"external\">Victor Newman on the futility of everyone sharing everything in an organization:</a> The first problem is the implicit economic paradigm people apply to ideas and knowledge: if everything is shared, it will be perceived to have little or no value. Second, you can spend as much time interpreting shared things of low value as high. Third, people will only share with those whom they respect and from whom they can expect a return or who share the same problem of preserving or reinventing identity. These people don&#8217;t always work in the same organization. And fourth, not everyone is either pre-disposed or equipped to create (leave alone share) knowledge.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=573" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/573/dont-share-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Write With Style</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/569/write-with-style/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/569/write-with-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Pity the readers," advises Kurt Vonnegut, whom he calls "imperfect artists," struggling to master the difficult task of making sense of thousands of scribbles on the page. This is my favourite bit <a href="http://literature.sdsu.edu/onWRITING/vonnegutSTYLE.html" title="How To Write With Style" class="external">advice from Kurt Vonnegut's "How to Write With Style" (originally published in <cite>Palm Sunday,</cite> 1981)</a> that remains relevant in the networked age: "Our audience requires us to be sympathetic and patient readers, ever willing to simplify and clarify---whereas we would rather soar high above the crowd, singing like nightingales. This is the bad news." The good news? We can write about whatever we please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pity the readers,&#8221; advises Kurt Vonnegut, whom he calls &#8220;imperfect artists,&#8221; struggling to master the difficult task of making sense of thousands of scribbles on the page. This is my favourite bit <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2xpdGVyYXR1cmUuc2RzdS5lZHUvb25XUklUSU5HL3Zvbm5lZ3V0U1RZTEUuaHRtbA==" title=\"How To Write With Style\" class=\"external\">advice from Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s &#8220;How to Write With Style&#8221; (originally published in <cite>Palm Sunday,</cite> 1981)</a> that remains relevant in the networked age: &#8220;Our audience requires us to be sympathetic and patient readers, ever willing to simplify and clarify&#8212;whereas we would rather soar high above the crowd, singing like nightingales. This is the bad news.&#8221; The good news? We can write about whatever we please.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=569" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/569/write-with-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Decisions Tires Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/566/making-decisions-tires-brai/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/566/making-decisions-tires-brai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=tough-choices-how-making" title="Tough Choices: How Making Decisions Tires Your Brain" class="external">Marketing research in making choices reveals the brain as a muscle</a>: when depleted it comes less effective. Making choices depletes what is known as executive resources, and "downstream" decisions are affected adversely when we are forced to choose with a fatigued brain. Not only does this explain why I always pick plain yogurt in the refrigerator isle, but suggests that if we've just spent lots of time focusing on a particular task, exercising self-control or even if we've just made lots of seemingly minor choices, then we probably shouldn't try to make a major decision.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zY2lhbS5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS5jZm0/aWQ9dG91Z2gtY2hvaWNlcy1ob3ctbWFraW5n" title=\"Tough Choices: How Making Decisions Tires Your Brain\" class=\"external\">Marketing research involving making choices reveals the brain as a muscle</a>: when depleted it comes less effective. Making choices exhausts what is known as executive resources, and &#8220;downstream&#8221; decisions are affected adversely when we are forced to choose with a fatigued brain. Not only does this explain why I always pick plain yogurt in the refrigerator isle, but suggests that if we&#8217;ve just spent lots of time focusing on a particular task, exercising self-control or even if we&#8217;ve just made lots of seemingly minor choices, then we probably shouldn&#8217;t try to make a major decision.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=566" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/566/making-decisions-tires-brai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shortening the Tail of Scientific Expertise?</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/533/shortening-tail-scientific-expertise/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/533/shortening-tail-scientific-expertise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locating information and resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11745514&#038;fsrc=RSS" title="Great minds think (too much) alike" class="external">Is the web narrowing scientists' expertise?</a> Sociologist James Evans' work identifies that as more journals become available online, dramatically fewer articles are being cited in the research papers within them. "Rather than measuring the length of the tail, it seems that modern science is actually focusing on a tiny bit of it." The reasons for this phenomenon are unclear, but he does suggest that online databases make it less likely now than in the past for researchers to integrate serendipitous gems of discoveries into their research. Perhaps proving the old adage that, an "expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until, eventually, he knows everything about nothing."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5lY29ub21pc3QuY29tL3NjaWVuY2UvZGlzcGxheXN0b3J5LmNmbT9zdG9yeV9pZD0xMTc0NTUxNCYjMDM4O2ZzcmM9UlNT" title=\"Great minds think (too much) alike\" class=\"external\">Is the web narrowing scientists&#8217; expertise?</a> Sociologist James Evans&#8217; work identifies that as more journals become available online, dramatically fewer articles are being cited in the research papers within them. &#8220;Rather than measuring the length of the tail, it seems that modern science is actually focusing on a tiny bit of it.&#8221; The reasons for this phenomenon are unclear, but he does suggest that online databases make it less likely now than in the past for researchers to integrate serendipitous gems of discoveries into their research. Perhaps proving the old adage that, an &#8220;expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until, eventually, he knows everything about nothing.&#8221;</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=533" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/533/shortening-tail-scientific-expertise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Weird Science of Stock Photography</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/531/weird-science-stock-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/531/weird-science-stock-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2195237" title="The Weird Science of Stock Photography" class="external">Advertising deconstructed</a>: Stock photography suppliers must be able to guess which abstract concepts clients want to illustrate, and then have photos and video on hand that resonates. So,what can we glean from the ubiquitous "Everywhere Girl" and mid-ocean oil rig in a storm?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zbGF0ZS5jb20vaWQvMjE5NTIzNw==" title=\"The Weird Science of Stock Photography\" class=\"external\">Advertising deconstructed</a>: Stock photography suppliers must be able to guess which abstract concepts clients want to illustrate, and then have photos and video on hand that resonates. So,what can we glean from the ubiquitous &#8220;Everywhere Girl&#8221; and mid-ocean oil rig in a storm?</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=531" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/531/weird-science-stock-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Being There</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/527/the-importance-of-being-there/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/527/the-importance-of-being-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7507797.stm" title="The Importance of Being There" class="external">Bill Thompson's thoughtful conclusions</a> on attending a seminar to see Clay Shirky think out loud about social tools, a seminar that he might just as easily have attended online, but one he was driven to attend in person by an 'inner need':<blockquote cite="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7507797.stm" title="Bill Thomspon">What is clear, however, is that the boundaries between the online and offline worlds are blurring as we put our hands through the looking-glass of the screen to shake hands with those on the other side, occasionally pulling them back through into what we still like to call "real life".</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL25ld3MuYmJjLmNvLnVrLzIvaGkvdGVjaG5vbG9neS83NTA3Nzk3LnN0bQ==" title=\"The Importance of Being There\" class=\"external\">Bill Thompson&#8217;s thoughtful conclusions</a> on attending a seminar to see Clay Shirky think out loud about social tools, a seminar that he might just as easily have attended online, but one he was driven to attend in person by an &#8216;inner need&#8217;:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7507797.stm" title="Bill Thomspon"><p>
What is clear, however, is that the boundaries between the online and offline worlds are blurring as we put our hands through the looking-glass of the screen to shake hands with those on the other side, occasionally pulling them back through into what we still like to call &#8220;real life&#8221;.
</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=527" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/527/the-importance-of-being-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sky Is Falling</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/526/the-sky-is-falling/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/526/the-sky-is-falling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The odds that a potentially devastating space rock will hit Earth this century may be as high as one in 10. <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200806/asteroids" title="The Sky is Falling" class="external">Gregg Easterbrook explores why NASA isn't trying harder to prevent catastrophe</a>, and in doing so offers insight into why our institutions learn so slowly. Conventional thinking--that the remaining space rocks are few, and that encounters with planets were confined to our prehistoric past--has been eclipsed by more dangerous realities, but serve to support NASA's preoccupation with building a manned moon base.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The odds that a potentially devastating space rock will hit Earth this century may be as high as one in 10. <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50aGVhdGxhbnRpYy5jb20vZG9jLzIwMDgwNi9hc3Rlcm9pZHM=" title=\"The Sky is Falling\" class=\"external\">Gregg Easterbrook explores why NASA isn&#8217;t trying harder to prevent catastrophe</a>, and in doing so offers insight into why our institutions learn so slowly. Conventional thinking&#8211;that the remaining space rocks are few, and that encounters with planets were confined to our prehistoric past&#8211;has been eclipsed by more dangerous realities, but serve to support NASA&#8217;s preoccupation with building a manned moon base.</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=526" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/526/the-sky-is-falling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawn of the Picasso Fish</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/524/dawn-of-the-picasso-fish/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/524/dawn-of-the-picasso-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reconceptualizing understandings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/07/09/dawn-of-the-picasso-fish/" title="Dawn of the Picasso Fish" class="external">Carl Zimmer gives a typically fascinating account of the evolution of our understanding of how the flatfish came to have two eyes on one side of its head</a>, an evolutionary conundrum that engaged both Charles Darwin and his critics. Darwin argued that the trait evolved over many generations of flatfish; however there was no evidence for this morphological development in the fossil record.The most recent contribution to the story is evolutionary biologist Matt Friedman's discovery of three examples of transitional forms of flatfish among the dusty fossil collections of Europe. What is most interesting to me is that these fossils were long ago collected and curated, but so clearly satisfy the requirement of a Darwinian intermediate. <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080709/full/news.2008.946.html" title="The Eyes Have It" class="external">Matt Friedman explains</a>:<blockquote cite="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080709/full/news.2008.946.html" title="Matt Friedman">I suppose there is a general perception that museum collections are dusty, static archives, and that everything in them has been carefully studied and precisely identified. But the truth is that they are much more than just long-term storage, because as our interpretive framework matures, we can begin to make sense of specimens that evaded or baffled earlier generations of researchers, or draw new conclusions about materials we mistakenly thought we had figured out ages ago.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2Jsb2dzLmRpc2NvdmVybWFnYXppbmUuY29tL2xvb20vMjAwOC8wNy8wOS9kYXduLW9mLXRoZS1waWNhc3NvLWZpc2gv" title=\"Dawn of the Picasso Fish\" class=\"external\">Carl Zimmer gives a typically fascinating account of the evolution of our understanding of how the flatfish came to have two eyes on one side of its head</a>, an evolutionary conundrum that engaged both Charles Darwin and his critics. Darwin argued that the trait evolved over many generations of flatfish; however there was no evidence for this morphological development in the fossil record.The most recent contribution to the story is evolutionary biologist Matt Friedman&#8217;s discovery of three examples of transitional forms of flatfish among the dusty fossil collections of Europe. What is most interesting to me is that these fossils were long ago collected and curated, but so clearly satisfy the requirement of a Darwinian intermediate. <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5uYXR1cmUuY29tL25ld3MvMjAwOC8wODA3MDkvZnVsbC9uZXdzLjIwMDguOTQ2Lmh0bWw=" title=\"The Eyes Have It\" class=\"external\">Matt Friedman explains</a>:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080709/full/news.2008.946.html" title="Matt Friedman"><p>
I suppose there is a general perception that museum collections are dusty, static archives, and that everything in them has been carefully studied and precisely identified. But the truth is that they are much more than just long-term storage, because as our interpretive framework matures, we can begin to make sense of specimens that evaded or baffled earlier generations of researchers, or draw new conclusions about materials we mistakenly thought we had figured out ages ago.
</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=524" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/524/dawn-of-the-picasso-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next Renaissance</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/525/the-next-renaissance/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/525/the-next-renaissance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engaging with online learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his keynote address at the Personal Democracy Forum 2008, <a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff08/rushkoff08_index.html" title="The Next Renaissance" class="external">Douglas Rushkoff points out that there is in fact nothing personal about democracy</a>. Rather, it is about transcending the self and acting collectively. Sadly, even though the social media tools we use cede central authority to decentralized groups and give us a way to participate in small ways, we tend to miss the real opportunity to reconfigure how democracy operates. The opportunity is not to blog about politics, but rather to reclaim our role as citizens who participate in the creation of the society in which we want to live:<blockquote cite="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff08/rushkoff08_index.html" title="Douglas Rushkoff">If Obama is indeed elected "the first truly Internet-enabled candidateâ€”we should take him at his word. He does not offer himself as the agent of change, but as an advocate of the change that could be enacted by people. It is not for government to create solar power, for example, but to get out of the way of all those people who are ready to implement solar power, themselves. Responding to the willingness of people to act, he can remove regulations developed on behalf of the oil industry to restrict its proliferation.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his keynote address at the Personal Democracy Forum 2008, <a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5lZGdlLm9yZy8zcmRfY3VsdHVyZS9ydXNoa29mZjA4L3J1c2hrb2ZmMDhfaW5kZXguaHRtbA==" title=\"The Next Renaissance\" class=\"external\">Douglas Rushkoff points out that there is in fact nothing personal about democracy</a>. Rather, it is about transcending the self and acting collectively. Sadly, even though the social media tools we use cede central authority to decentralized groups and give us a way to participate in small ways, we tend to miss the real opportunity to reconfigure how democracy operates (<i>cf.</i> the first Renaissance). The opportunity is not to blog about politics, but rather to reclaim our role as citizens who participate in the creation of the society in which we want to live:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff08/rushkoff08_index.html" title="Douglas Rushkoff"><p>
If Obama is indeed elected <q>the first truly Internet-enabled candidate,</q> we should take him at his word. He does not offer himself as the agent of change, but as an advocate of the change that could be enacted by people. It is not for government to create solar power, for example, but to get out of the way of all those people who are ready to implement solar power, themselves. Responding to the willingness of people to act, he can remove regulations developed on behalf of the oil industry to restrict its proliferation.
</p></blockquote>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=525" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/525/the-next-renaissance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cultural Evolution</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/523/cultural-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://shantarohse.com/523/cultural-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/cultural_evolution.php" title="Cultural Evolution" class="external">Paul Ehrlich makes some observations on the daunting task of building a comprehensive theory of cultural change</a>. He dismisses Richard Dawkins' brave but flawed conjecture about "memes" (gene analogs of cultural inheritance), but does support the contentious notion that natural selection can operate in cultural evolution as well as in genetic evolution, although not likely as a central force. He paints a daunting but hopeful and certainly vital undertaking. "...since everything from weapons of mass destruction to global heating are the results of changes in human culture over time, acquiring a fundamental understanding of cultural evolution just might be the key to saving civilization from itself."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zZWVkbWFnYXppbmUuY29tL25ld3MvMjAwOC8wNi9jdWx0dXJhbF9ldm9sdXRpb24ucGhw" title=\"Cultural Evolution\" class=\"external\">Paul Ehrlich makes some observations on the daunting task of building a comprehensive theory of cultural change</a>. He dismisses Richard Dawkins&#8217; brave but flawed conjecture about &#8220;memes&#8221; (gene analogs of cultural inheritance), but does support the contentious notion that natural selection can operate in cultural evolution as well as in genetic evolution, although not likely as a central force. He paints a daunting but hopeful and certainly vital undertaking. &#8220;&#8230;since everything from weapons of mass destruction to global heating are the results of changes in human culture over time, acquiring a fundamental understanding of cultural evolution just might be the key to saving civilization from itself.&#8221;</p>
 <img src="http://shantarohse.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=523" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shantarohse.com/523/cultural-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
