<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is Web 2.0 Failing in Biology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shantarohse.com/417/why-web20-failing-in-biology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shantarohse.com/417/why-web20-failing-in-biology/</link>
	<description>learning and learning design in a net-centric world</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://shantarohse.com/417/why-web20-failing-in-biology/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>David Crotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shantarohse.com/?p=417#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>Hi Shanta,
An updated, and slightly less pessimistic version of the same talk is available here:
http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/04/03/web-20-for-biologists-are-any-of-the-current-tools-worth-using/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shanta,<br />
An updated, and slightly less pessimistic version of the same talk is available here:<br />
<a href="http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/04/03/web-20-for-biologists-are-any-of-the-current-tools-worth-using/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/04/03/web-20-for-biologists-are-any-of-the-current-tools-worth-using/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
